An Insurance Industry Case Study - Compass for Agent Recruitment Personnel
دراسة حالة مثيرة للاهتمام حول تطبيق Compass ومقاييس النتائج لأحد كبار مزودي خدمات التأمين في الهند.
في هذه الصفحة
- Problem statement
- الحل
- التواصل
- لوحة التحكم
- التأثير
- منهجية تقييم الأثر
- User survey results
- Comparison of adoption of performers Vs. non-performers
- Comparison of business data of the previous with the implemented period
- Growth comparisons 1st half to 2nd half of month - Feb, March, April (period of implementation)
Our client is one of the Best General Insurance Companies in Asia and they received the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) certificate of Registration in 2001. They are renowned for their outstanding customer service levels and innovations in the field of insurance.
They have been generating continuous profitability over the years. Today the company has a country-wide network in over 200 towns spread from Surat to Siliguri and Jammu to Thiruvananthapuram. Their Head Office is located in Pune.
Problem statement
Workforce size: 500
Levels: Executive (Level 1) and Junior Manager (Level 2)
The company’s full-time sales executives (called the Recruiters - POS team) have the following activities as their deliverables: Code generation, Activisations, and Premium collected. The POS team primarily visits businesses in their territory to recruit them as Insurance sales partners. When the business owner signs up as a partner, it is called a ‘code generation ’(expressed as a new recruitment count). When a business owner sells a policy, it is called an ‘activation’ (this is expressed as a count of policies sold). The total premium collected by the business owner is expressed as ‘Premium collected’.
While there are monthly reports of Code generation, Activisations, and Premium collected sent out to the POS team, they need to raise a request to update the number of activisation, the premium collected, and resultantly the commission they are eligible for. It takes an average of a day for this report to reach them or their manager.
The company wanted this performance data to be more transparent and readily available for their POS team. They also wanted to use this data to nudge the team to perform better and recognize the high achievers.
الحل
Commission design
تم استخدام ميزات تصميم برنامج Compass وإدارة المستخدم ومصادر البيانات والمتغيرات لبناء منطق العمولة الموضح أدناه.
Pre-conditions:
Both the Level 1 and Level 2 recruiters are eligible for the commission if at least 40% of their new POS agents have been active. Yet again, a POS agent will be considered active only if they meet the following conditions:
- The POS agent needs to be newly recruited within the current month
- The POS agent should have generated a minimum of INR 1000 Premium.
Conditional commission slabs:
Achievement conditions:
One active POS within same month: INR.50/-
Two and above active POS within same month: INR.100/- per recruitment (codes generated)
Level and tenure conditions:
Level 1 and Tenure 1 Month:
Recruitment Target: 10
Commission: Rs.100 per recruitment
Level 1 and Tenure > 1 Month to 6 months:
Recruitment Target: 25
Commission: Rs.100 per recruitment
Level 2 and Tenure 1 Month:
Recruitment Target: 14
Commission: Rs.150 per recruitment
Level 2 and Tenure > 1 Month to 6 months:
Recruitment Target: 35
Commission: Rs.150 per recruitment
Nudge conditions:
Target milestone-wise nudges for:
Level 1 and Tenure 1 Month:
Cumulative Recruitment Milestones: 3, 5, 8, 10
التكرار: أسبوعيًا
Level 1 and Tenure > 1 Month to 6 months:
Cumulative Recruitment Milestones: 7, 13, 19, 25
التكرار: أسبوعيًا
Level 2 and Tenure 1 Month:
Cumulative Recruitment Milestones: 3, 7, 10, 14
التكرار: أسبوعيًا
Level 2 and Tenure > 1 Month to 6 months:
Cumulative Recruitment Milestones: 9, 18, 27, 35
التكرار: أسبوعيًا
تنبيه تحذير الأداء
The Level 1 and Level 2 recruiters who have not achieved a minimum 75% of their recruitment target and 25% activation in a quarter need to be notified with a performance warning nudge to improve their performance - else face separation in the coming months.
التواصل
تم استخدام ميزة "مجموعات Compass " لإرسال رسائل الفريق التي عرضت ما يلي:
- اختراقات الأداء
- إعلانات الإنجازات
- نصائح وشهادات المؤدي
- الوعي بميزة Compass
- الوعي بمحفظة Compass
- الوعي بمكافآت ومزايا Compass
- توعية مجموعات Compass
- الوعي باسترداد Compass
- تسجيل المزيد من العمولات على Compass - الاختراقات
- الوعي "بماذا يفيدني
- Community-building activities with user-generated content
لوحة التحكم
أتاحت ميزة لوحة معلومات Compass لمديري الفروع والمديرين الإقليميين عرض ما يلي:
- Region-wise leaderboards
- Efficacy of the Commission programs in terms of the number of qualifiers for each program
- قوائم المتصدرين على مستوى البرامج
التأثير

منهجية تقييم الأثر
تم تقييم تأثير تطبيق Compass أعلاه باستخدام:
- User interviews of 100 end-users
- Comparison of adoption of Performers Vs. Nonperformers
- مقارنة بين بيانات الأعمال للفترة السابقة مع الفترة المنفذة
User survey results
نقطة البيانات 1: الوعي Compass
Heavy top-down drive, TTTs (train the trainer) programs, and training webinars helped drive awareness.

Datapoint 2: Source of awareness
Webinar + leaders (indicating top-down messaging) contribute to 68% of the download compared to Whatsapp (Grassroot messaging).

Datapoint 3: Compass installation status
The successful awareness initiative leads to a successful number of downloads.

Datapoint 4: Regular use and viewing of Compass programs and groups
A successful number of downloads and awareness initiatives pushed the feature usage.

Datapoint 5: Overall app ratings on various perceived benefits.
طُلب من المستخدمين مراجعة التطبيق بناءً على تصورهم للمزايا التالية على مقياس التقييم: 1 - غير راضٍ إلى حد كبير، 2 - غير راضٍ إلى حد ما، 3 - محايد، 4 - راضٍ إلى حد ما، 5 - راضٍ إلى حد كبير.

Comparison of adoption of performers Vs. non-performers
Performers seem to be heavy adopters of Compass.


Comparison of business data of the previous with the implemented period
Achievement - April’21 1-15 period Vs. April’21 15-30 period
Avg. Codes Generated per Team member
Growth: 136%

Avg. Active recruitments per Team member
Growth: 100%

Growth comparisons 1st half to 2nd half of month - Feb, March, April (period of implementation)
Overall growth % in codes generated.

Overall growth % in active recruitments
